Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine
Harsha Nori*‡ Yin Tat Lee* Sheng Zhang* Dean Carignan Richard Edgar Nicolo Fusi Nicholas King Jonathan Larson Yuanzhi Li Weishung Liu Renqian Luo Scott Mayer McKinney† Robert Osazuwa Ness Hoifung Poon Tao Qin Naoto Usuyama Chris White Eric Horvitz‡
Abstract
Generalist foundation models such as GPT-4 have displayed surprising capabilities in a wide variety of domains and tasks. Yet, there is a prevalent assumption that they cannot match specialist capabilities without intensive training of models with specialty knowledge. For example, most explorations to date on medical competency benchmarks have leveraged domain-specific training, as exemplified by efforts on BioGPT and Med-PaLM. We build on a prior study of the specialist capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge benchmarks in the absence of special training. In distinction to the intentional use of simple prompting to highlight the model’s out-of-the-box capabilities, we perform a systematic exploration of prompt engineering to boost performance. We find that prompting innovation can unlock deeper specialist capabilities and show that GPT-4 easily tops prior leading results for medical question-answering datasets. The prompt engineering methods we explore are general purpose, and make no specific use of domain expertise, removing the need for expert-curated content. Our experimental design carefully controls for overfitting during the prompt engineering process. As a culmination o
原文 arXiv:2311.16452;中英对照 + 大白话阅读 https://aha.fim.ai/paper/2311.16452v1