Abstract

This paper reports the performances of shallow word-level convolutional neural networks (CNN), our earlier work (2015) [3, 4], on the eight datasets with relatively large training data that were used for testing the very deep character-level CNN in Conneau et al. (2016) [1]. Our findings are as follows. The shallow word-level CNNs achieve better error rates than the error rates reported in [1] though the results should be interpreted with some consideration due to the unique pre-processing of [1]. The shallow word-level CNN uses more parameters and therefore requires more storage than the deep character-level CNN; however, the shallow word-level CNN computes much faster.